Three scientists from the Meteorological Department has listed 56 reasons why you're wrong.
- We have come across a number of erroneous claims about the climate in connection with climate change, writes Rasmus Benestad, Øyvind Nordli and Hans Olav Hygen in an article published on forskning.no.
All three are researchers at the Meteorological Institute, and are tired of it ever comes up that they call for climate myths in the media. Now they will clean up, and has written a brief article in which they come with the 56 counter-argument. A kind of "climate for dummies" in other words.
- We want to give an overview of the most common allegations here, along with brief and technical objections. The article contains the fast section, where different claims are taken up .
What about the sun?
The first thirteen myths about the importance, some argue that the sun and cosmic radiation have for climate change. If this is true should be warming to increase more during the day than at night. But that is not argue the researchers.
- The temperature has risen more at night than during the day. Warmer or colder? So take the for the use of statistics, and the claim that the temperature on Earth has not risen since 1998. Holder not, says the three.
- There are other 10-year periods in the past 100 years that also shows an apparently "stop", but long-term development has nevertheless shown that these have been part of the positive trend The relationship between CO2 in the atmosphere and CO2 dissolved in the ocean are discussed.
Some argue that CO2 emissions has not really increased the temperature so much, that steam is an important greenhouse.
- This is wrong, write the three.
Where was the ice age?
It has been argued that the researchers at -70 tallet warned that the earth was moving into a new ice age. The three believe it was on the contrary, and that most scientists thought we stood in front of a global warming. Middelalderen alleged to have been warmer than we have now.
- These studies focus on Europe, and local changes are not the same as the global, type three. And also shows that there are studies that suggest that it was colder in the Middle Ages. What about the forest, which covered the Hardangervidda 8000 years ago?
The reason for this is that the Earth's axis has moved on, the time was the polar circle, was much farther south.
- Stack Reasoning
Benestad, Nordli and Hygen has written an unusual article, free for long and complex explanations. They use mostly a paragraph per topic, and the smeller they believe is the correct understanding of the table without a lot about men.
Here you can read the entire article Both the style and content has created debate. Some throw themselves over the individual points, the second does not like the shape, and described it as "Deficiency stack argument, junk, and selective.
What do you think, you have missed a "climate for dummies"? Comment below.
- We have come across a number of erroneous claims about the climate in connection with climate change, writes Rasmus Benestad, Øyvind Nordli and Hans Olav Hygen in an article published on forskning.no.
All three are researchers at the Meteorological Institute, and are tired of it ever comes up that they call for climate myths in the media. Now they will clean up, and has written a brief article in which they come with the 56 counter-argument. A kind of "climate for dummies" in other words.
- We want to give an overview of the most common allegations here, along with brief and technical objections. The article contains the fast section, where different claims are taken up .
What about the sun?
The first thirteen myths about the importance, some argue that the sun and cosmic radiation have for climate change. If this is true should be warming to increase more during the day than at night. But that is not argue the researchers.
- The temperature has risen more at night than during the day. Warmer or colder? So take the for the use of statistics, and the claim that the temperature on Earth has not risen since 1998. Holder not, says the three.
- There are other 10-year periods in the past 100 years that also shows an apparently "stop", but long-term development has nevertheless shown that these have been part of the positive trend The relationship between CO2 in the atmosphere and CO2 dissolved in the ocean are discussed.
Some argue that CO2 emissions has not really increased the temperature so much, that steam is an important greenhouse.
- This is wrong, write the three.
Where was the ice age?
It has been argued that the researchers at -70 tallet warned that the earth was moving into a new ice age. The three believe it was on the contrary, and that most scientists thought we stood in front of a global warming. Middelalderen alleged to have been warmer than we have now.
- These studies focus on Europe, and local changes are not the same as the global, type three. And also shows that there are studies that suggest that it was colder in the Middle Ages. What about the forest, which covered the Hardangervidda 8000 years ago?
The reason for this is that the Earth's axis has moved on, the time was the polar circle, was much farther south.
- Stack Reasoning
Benestad, Nordli and Hygen has written an unusual article, free for long and complex explanations. They use mostly a paragraph per topic, and the smeller they believe is the correct understanding of the table without a lot about men.
Here you can read the entire article Both the style and content has created debate. Some throw themselves over the individual points, the second does not like the shape, and described it as "Deficiency stack argument, junk, and selective.
What do you think, you have missed a "climate for dummies"? Comment below.
0 kommentarer:
Post a Comment